by: Society of Black Lawyers
released: January 2012
The Society of Black Lawyers is calling for the immediate prosecution of the three remaining men who are suspected of being involved in the racist murder of black teenager, Stephen Lawrence in 1993. The call follows the conviction and sentencing of David Norris and Gary Dobson who were both given life sentences at the Old Bailey today.
Norris was sentenced to a minimum of 14 years and three months and Dobson received 15 years and two months. Both were sentenced under old guidelines and as if they were juveniles because both were under 18 when the crime was committed.
Dobson had previously been acquitted in 1996 following a private prosecution brought by the Lawrence family. It was only due to a change in the law on double jeopardy in 2005 that he was able to be tried again.
Jide Lanlehin, criminal barrister commented:
‘We welcome the sentences that have been passed and recognise that the judge’s hands were tied in that respect. The sentences could have been much longer if judicial discretion, based on exceptional circumstances had been possible. Such a crime, if it had been committed by juveniles today would have attracted a far longer sentence. Sadly, neither the sentencing guidelines nor legislation allowed for such discretion to be exercised.’
Joint Enterprise: Luke Knight, Neil Acourt and Jamie Acourt
SBL Co-Chair, Peter Herbert OBE commented:
‘The SBL is calling on the Crown Prosecution Service to undertake an immediate review of this case, with a view to bringing prosecutions against the three remaining suspects. Our view is that the convictions of Norris and Dobson represent substantial new evidence of joint enterprise in relation to all five men. Luke Knight and the Acourt brothers should be re-interviewed. They should not think that they are safe from the continuing call for justice.’
Rosemary Emodi, Vice Chair of the SBL commented:
‘SBL made written and oral submissions to the Macpherson Inquiry in 1998, arguing that the law on double jeopardy should be reviewed. It was the one recommendation that specifically addressed the particularly circumstances of the Lawrence family following the failed private prosecution in 1996. The wide-ranging impact of the Stephen Lawrence case is well documented.
But it was the dignified and unwavering fight for justice by Doreen and Neville Lawrence that has been so compelling. As lawyers, the SBL believes that our role is not just to practice the law. We must shape it, influence it and where necessary, change it. Dobson’s conviction stands as an enduring testament to that belief.’
NOTES TO EDITORS
For further press enquiries or interviews, please contact: Peter Herbert OBE
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org / email@example.com
Mobile: +44 (0) 7973 794 946)/ +44 (0) 7956 337 451
The Society of Black Lawyers is the oldest organisation of African, Caribbean and Asian lawyers, jurists and law students.
Founded in 1969 by the late Rudy Narayan and Sigbhat Kadric QC, the SBL is a dynamic civil rights advocacy organisation which exists to:
- Promote equality and diversity within the legal profession;
- Act as a representative and strategic voice for lawyers, legal executives, law students, paralegals, jurists and legal academics of African, Asian and Caribbean heritage; and
- Campaign to ensure access to justice and legal services for ethnic minority and disadvantaged communities.
Lawrence verdict alone won’t stop black anger, PM is told
4th January 2012
2 thoughts on “Lawrence convictions should be treated as new evidence of a ‘joint enterprise’”
Indeed Rose. I can only assume a complete lack of substance to his assertions. Acquiescence is probably the right choice for Peter.
Sadly SBL’s website comments seems to be disabled. And Peter Herbert hasn’t replied to this sent direct to his own website…
Hi Peter, the SBL site comments doesn’t seem to work. I support JENGbA http://www.jointenterprise.co and wondered if you can expand the reasoning why you said “Our view is that the convictions of Norris and Dobson represent substantial new evidence of a joint enterprise in relation to all five men”? Can you also share what SBL’s policy is regarding Joint Enterprise?
Maybe he’s too busy to explain why SBL seems so pro-Joint Enterprise when JENGbA has found that the majority of people serving life for JE murder are non-white.
Comments are closed.